Noir/Illuminati II (A & B): Defining Socially Responsible Affordable Luxury Clothing

Case Abstract

Peter Ingwersen founded the companies in February 2005. The two entities were like Siamese twins; Noir designed and produced luxury clothing for women, while Illuminati II was set up to produce high quality, fair-trade, organic cotton fabrics of the highest quality both for Noir and other leading fashion brands. Together, they provided the basis for a totally new concept in fashion. Over the years, Peter had attended many fashion shows all over world and had become both aware and very concerned by the total lack of “social substance” of many of the major fashion companies. Was fashion just the ultimate personalisation of some of the worst aspects of human behaviour?

Part A: Defining Socially Responsible Affordable Luxury Clothing

Was fashion all about egocentrism and showing off? Could something be done to bring back meaning and substance to the world of fashion? Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) was making its way into most other industries: why could it not infiltrate fashion? Was there any way to improve the “feel good” factor of beautiful clothes with a clear social responsibility message? Could egocentrism rhyme with eco-friendliness?

Conceptually it was very clear: Noir/Illuminati II would define socially responsible affordable luxury clothing. Putting the concept into operation was the real challenge. Building a brand on social awareness, or the guilt of conspicuous consumption, could clearly be a two-edged sword. Would customers buy the story? Even more pressing, would investors follow him in this venture?

Part B: Greenwash and Anorexic Models

Peter could not believe his eyes. He was just sifting through comments posted on the Inhabitat website following the London and New York Fashion Weeks. While the articles themselves were very supportive of his strategy and Rikke Wienmann’s collections, the postings on the website’s readers’ comments were direct attacks on his sustainability and social responsibility rationales, basically labelling them “greenwash,” and very critical of his choice of models, too skinny by today’s standards and concerns for anorexia.

With the violent heartburn receding, he tried to understand what the implications of such rash customer perceptions could be for the brand and its positioning. Maybe this was just an isolated incident from disgruntled British and American customers, overexposed to the issues and hence over-sensitive to them. But maybe it also reflected a turning point in the Corporate Social Responsibility movement. Were people really starting to feel that way? Were they starting to question these CSR labels and how much they really did for people in Africa? Was this the beginning of the dreaded backlash against the new green political correctness? Was CSR now also spreading to issues such as people’s weights?

The responses from the fashion editor and other readers were encouraging, but it was time maybe to prepare for similar questioning of the underlying philosophy of the company. It was time for sure to shed more light on Illuminati II’s contributions to Ugandan’s farmers…

Authors: Benoît Leleux, Barbara Scheel Agersnap
Institution: IMD, Switzerland
Competition Year2010
PlaceFinalist
TrackSocial Entrepreneurship
Key WordsCorporate Social Responsibility, Ethics, Fashion, Managing Growth, Funding Growth, Venturing, Brand Building, Fair-trade, Organic Production, Positioning, Retail Concept, Anorexia, Greenwash
Target AudienceMBA, Business Executives
Permission RightsThe case is available for purchase from the Case Centre: Part A (IMD-3-1909), Part B (IMD-3-1910). It is also part of the oikos Case Collection book (Volume 2): Case Studies in Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainability published by Greenleaf.
DownloadInspection Copy (Part A, Part B)
Author image

oikos International

posted June 30, 2010

This might be for you.

WaterHealth International: Providing Safe Drinking Water to the Bottom of the Pyramid Consumers

Case Abstract

This case study is about Irvine, California-based WaterHealth International Inc. (WHI), a social purpose for-profit venture in the safe water sector, focused on serving the traditionally underserved ‘Bottom of the Pyramid’ (BoP) segment. The company’s aim was to ensure increasing returns for the company and its investors while achieving a social impact.

Developing countries face a water crisis with more than 2 billion people lacking access to potable water and often having to rely on contaminated water resources. This has led to children suffering from diminutive growth due to water-borne diseases. In addition to deaths and economic loss, women and girls, on whom the burden of obtaining water falls, have to trek long distances and spend hours of their time fetching water – time that could be better spent with the family or on economic activities.
Distressed by the suffering caused by water-borne diseases and the associated economic loss, Ashok Gadgil (Gadgil), an Indian born physicist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, sought to find a solution to the problem. And he came up with the innovative and breakthrough UV Waterworks (UVW) technology. The UVW technology disinfected water from harmful pathogens and microbes with the help of ultraviolet light. The result was safe and clean drinking water that exceeded the World Health Organization’s (WHO) water standards and was sold to BoP consumers. In 1996, Gadgil licensed the UVW technology to WHI, set up by Ghana-born entrepreneur and Johnson & Johnson veteran Tralance Addy (Addy).
As the CEO of WHI, Addy played a crucial role in refining the business model. WHI helped arrange loans for communities to finance the installations of its water systems and the beneficiaries had to pay a nominal user fee to avail of the service. The company also offered a franchise model to entrepreneurs where they received a return on investment within 12 to 18 months. The proceeds were enough to cover the expense of the UVW system, cost of installations, and maintenance of the equipment. WHI was successful in attracting commercial financing for setting up its water systems.
As of mid-2009, more than 600 WaterHealthCenters (WHCs) had been installed in many countries including India, the Philippines, and Ghana, providing safe water to more than one million people around the world. WHI’s aim was to take the UVW technology and its water system to needy communities throughout the world by establishing a global presence. While experts appreciated WHI’s efforts to provide potable supply of water to underprivileged communities in developing countries and felt the business model was sustainable, they pointed out that certain aspects of its water systems and business model needed to be changed to make it more relevant to the target segment. Obtaining the capital to help more communities finance these water systems, so as to ultimately achieve significant scale relative to the magnitude of the problem, was another challenge.

Authors: Hadiya Faheem, Debapratim Purkayastha
Institution: ICMR Center for Management Research, India
Competition Year2010
Place3rd place
TrackSocial Entrepreneurship
Key WordsEntrepreneurship, Social Entrepreneurship, Bottom of the Pyramid, Business Model, Revenue Model, Operations, Social Marketing, Safe Water, Water Purification Systems, Community Water Systems
CoursesSocial Entrepreneurship, Strategy
Target AudiencePostgraduate Students
Permission RightsThis case is available for purchase from the Case Centre (810-018-1). This case is also part of the oikos Case Collection book (Volume 2): Case Studies in Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainability published by Greenleaf.
DownloadInspection Copy

Author image

oikos International

posted June 30, 2010

This might be for you.

So You Want to be a Social Entrepreneur: Starting Out, Scaling Up, Staying Committed

Case Abstract

The global water crisis is a silent crisis. It does not attract the same level of attention as airline accidents or plummeting economic statistics, yet its toll is far more staggering: more than 3 billion illnesses and 2 million deaths result from drinking contaminated water each year. These casualties take place almost exclusively in the developing world and the rural poor bear the brunt of the burden. Hippo Water International (HWI) is U.S.-based nonprofit organization that aims to improve access to water by implementing sustainable solutions to the global water crisis. HWI’s flagship product is the Water Roller, an innovative water transportation tool that carries water inside its “wheel,” transforming 200 pounds (90 kg) of water to an effective weight of just 22 pounds (10 kg). The Water Roller makes it possible to collect 24 gallons (90 liters) of water- five times the amount possible using traditional methods – in less time and much more easily.

The Water Roller was invented in 1991, and over the course of the next 15 years, approximately 30,000 Water Rollers were distributed, almost exclusively in a few South African provinces. HWI’s director, Cynthia Koenig, founded the organisation with the intention of assisting the manufacturer / distributer of the Water Roller bring the product to new international markets. But what began as a project to occupy her spare time as she searched for full-time employment soon took centre stage, with Cynthia taking on responsibility for marketing, fundraising, product redesign, and day-to-day operations. Different business philosophies and goals ultimately led Cynthia and HWI to break their ties with the South African manufacturer and strike out on their own with the redesigned Water Roller. In the process, Cynthia has experienced the professional and personal challenges and rewards of starting and operating a social enterprise.

Authors: Michael Gordon
Institution: Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, USA
Competition Year2010
Place1st place
TrackSocial Entrepreneurship
Key WordsSocial enterprise, Social entrepreneur, Nonprofit organisation, Growth strategy, Water crisis, Contaminated water, Water Roller, Developing countries, Sustainable solutions
CoursesSocial Enterprise, Social Entrepreneurship, Base of the Pyramid Business
Target Audience MBA, BBA
Permission RightsThis case is part of the oikos free case collection. Download a free online copy below. If you are a faculty member and you are interested in teaching this case, you can request a free teaching note by sending us an email to freecase@oikosinternational.org.

This case is also part of the new oikos Case Collection book (Volume 2): Case Studies in Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainability published by Greenleaf.
DownloadFree Online Case
Author image

oikos International

posted June 30, 2010

This might be for you.

Portland Roasting Company: Farm Friendly Direct

Case Abstract

This case describes the issues and dilemmas facing a company in their efforts to differentiate their product through a social sustainability programme. Over the years, the company has built a strong reputation with their sustainability efforts, particularly amongst their peers in the specialty coffee industry. There is some question as to whether this reputation has been visible to consumers and if consumers see the value-proposition.  The case covers the history of coffee, the specialty coffee industry, the supply chain and roles of different participants, and the competitive landscape.

Furthermore, most of the competitive eco-labels and certification schemes are discussed.  The reader is asked to decide the appropriate method for conveying the company’s social sustainability efforts to the marketplace and beyond that, to consider how one might measure and monitor social programs in the developing world. The case is designed to highlight decisions related to marketing and operations strategy, pros and cons of certification, and particularly social sustainability versus the other aspects of sustainability.

Authors: Madeleine Pullman, Greg Stokes, Price Gregory, Mark Langston, Brandon Arends
Institution: Portland State University, USA
Competition Year2010
Place1st place
TrackCorporate Sustainability
Key WordsCorporate Sustainability, Coffee, Social sustainability programme, Supply chain, Eco-labels, Certification, Measuring, Monitoring
CoursesStrategy, Marketing, Supply Chain Management
Target AudienceMBA, Business Executives
Permission RightsThis case is part of the oikos free case collection. Download a free online copy below. If you are a faculty member and you are interested in teaching this case, you can request a free teaching note by sending us an email to freecase@oikosinternational.org.
DownloadFree Online Copy
Author image

oikos International

posted June 30, 2010

This might be for you.

Lululemon’s commitment to the environment: A tangle of seaweed, suppliers, and social responsibility

Case Abstract

This case introduces Lululemon, an athletic and yoga wear retailer, and their commitment to the environment. The company was founded on its Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiative, and took pride in its innovative approach towards the environment. The company trusted the suppliers with which it had relationships, and believed the products it was buying were as the suppliers described. Lululemon, faced with pressure to expand and maximise profits while maintaining its CSR pledge to the environment and innovation, found itself in a difficult position when an environmentally-friendly fiber it used for a clothing product was determined to be marketed falsely.

Globalisation is an inevitable facet of today’s business world. Many companies rely on manufacturers and suppliers from around the world in order to manage businesses and generate profits. The connection between a corporate headquarters and its many suppliers illustrates, in some cases, exciting, new opportunities, and in others, ill-conceived relationships destined for failure. Companies that expand rapidly require more trust in the growing number of suppliers they rely on, and can experience growing pains more frequently or to a greater degree than those experienced by well-established companies with moderate expansion strategies.

Many businesses incorporate sustainability efforts as part of their strategic plan and corporate social responsibility initiative. Businesses are attempting to find a balance between responsibility toward the environment while maximising profits. Companies that incorporate sustainability as part of their strategic plan are often viewed as innovative and responsible; elevating their status as a socially responsible organisation.

This case introduces Lululemon, an athletic and yoga wear retailer, and their commitment to the environment. The company was founded on its Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiative, and took pride in its innovative approach towards the environment. The company trusted the suppliers with which it had relationships, and believed the products it was buying were as the suppliers described. Lululemon, faced with pressure to expand and maximise profits while maintaining its CSR pledge to the environment and innovation, found itself in a difficult position when an environmentally-friendly fiber it used for a clothing product was determined to be marketed falsely.

This case has been developed for academics and professionals alike interested in the effects of rapid expansion, and the role CSR can play in a sustainability strategy when profit maximisation is pursued. It also deals with the trust needed between supplier and buyer, and the effects of ineffective due diligence. The case aids in analysing sustainability as a foundation for both strategic and CSR plans, as well as detailing how a company can be directly held responsible for its suppliers’ actions.

Authors: Andrea Erin Bass
Institution: University of Nebraska-Omaha, USA
Competition Year2010
Place2nd place
TrackCorporate Sustainability
Key WordsGlobalisation, Growth Strategy, Corporate Social Responsibility, Retailer, Yoga, Clothing, Suppliers, Due Diligence, Fabric
CoursesMarketing, Ethics and Social Responsibility, Operations Management, Business Administration
Permission RightsThis case is part of the oikos free case collection. Download a free online copy below. If you are a faculty member and you are interested in teaching this case, you can request a free teaching note by sending us an email to freecase@oikosinternational.org.
DownloadFree Online Copy
Author image

oikos International

posted June 30, 2010

This might be for you.

Hunghom Peninsula in Hong Kong (A), (B) & (C): A Realistic Call for Corporate Social Responsibilities

Case abstract

Hunghom Peninsula was a residential building complex with a superior location in Hong Kong.  The harbour-view flats were originally built under the government’s abandoned Private Sector Participation Scheme, a program intended to provide affordable housing for middle-class residents. Fears by wealthy land owners and developers that the scheme would erode property values in a shrinking market led the government to abandon the subsidized housing scheme altogether in 2002. The two developers, New World Development Company Limited (NWD) and Sun Hung Kai Properties Limited (SHKP), Hong Kong’s two biggest developers which had been engaged in the construction of Hunghom, subsequently came forward to take ownership of Hunghom Peninsula. After taking the project, the consortium announced the demolition of these buildings to make way for luxury apartments.

The protest voices from environmentalists, nearby residents and even councillors criticized the government’s careless decision, especially the negligence of social responsibilities as well as other social shareholders’ interests and environmental concerns in yielding to real estate developers’ profit-oriented plan.  Faced with a huge popular outcry about the needless destruction of “perfectly good buildings” to satisfy “corporate greed”, the two developers, NWD and SHKP dropped their demolition plan in favour of other less profitable but more environmental-friendly renovation plans.

Authors: Terence Tsai, Shubo Philip Liu
Institution: China Europe International Business School, Shanghai, P.R. China
Competition Year2010
PlaceFinalist
TrackCorporate Sustainability
Key WordsResidential Buildings, Real Estate Project, Hong Kong, Stakeholder Analysis, Business Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility, Business Strategy
CoursesBusiness Ethics, Business Strategy
Target AudienceMBA, EMBA
Permission RightsThis case is available for purchase from the Case Centre: Part A (710-046-1), Part B (710-047-1) and Part C (710-048-1)
DownloadInspection Copy
Author image

oikos International

posted June 30, 2010

This might be for you.

Good Water: Standing on Holy Ground

Case Abstract

By 2009, New Zealand businessman and Good Water CEO, Grant Hall, was one year into his five year plan to achieve his nirvana vision of a closed loop system. He wanted to sell water in bottles made from local biomass, with the used bottle waste separated, recycled into plant pottles, allowed to biodegrade to support new plant-life and sources of biomass for further production of water bottles. To make his plan a reality, Good Water and competitors who took up the Good Water project challenge of using plant-based plastic (PLA) bottles for their products, needed to ramp up volume considerably.

Doing so would create demand for a local biomass supply and incentivise the infrastructure needed for separation and recycling of PLA. Meanwhile, there were issues around the desirability of and the need for bottled water, and the resultant creation of a huge amount of plastic waste. Grant had succeeded in bringing together a number of key partners in the Good Water project, but it was not without its problems or detractors. How should Grant develop the Good Water Company and the wider Good Water project?

Authors: Steve Bowden, Eva Collins, Kate Kearins, Helen Tregigda
Institution: Waikato Management School, Auckland University of Technology
Competition Year2010
Place2nd place
TrackSocial Entrepreneurship
Key WordsWater Bottles, Biomass, Recycling, Plant-based Plastic (PLA), Plastic Waste
CoursesStrategic Management, Environmental Management, Sustainability, Social Entrepreneurship, Environmental Entrepreneurship, Business model
Target AudienceUndergraduate Students, Postgraduate Students
Permission RightsThis case was published in: Bowden, S., Kearins, K., Collins, E. & Tregidga, H. 2010. Good Water and Good Plastic? (case and non-published instructors manual). Case Research Journal, 30(4): 1-11.
Author image

oikos International

posted June 30, 2010

This might be for you.

ALTIS – A Microfinance Startup in Nepal

Case Abstract

This case describes the issues and dilemmas facing a social entrepreneur in his efforts to initiate a microfinance operation in the rural agricultural areas of Nepal. Although Nepal government supports microfinance models, a recent civil war severely disrupted government services and worsened poverty.  The case covers the recent history of Nepal, the condition of the country’s capital markets, the ALTIS concept and the competitive landscape.

Sanjay is seeking to establish the microfinance enterprise to serve the rural agriculture regions of Nepal, where little to nothing has been done to serve the poor. Sanjay possesses much of the expertise, a high level of motivation and many key stakeholder relationships to help him establish the microfinance enterprise. He has given a lot of thought to the funding needs, financial and technical services components of the client model and the initial management structure.  However, there remain a number of issues he has yet to fully consider and he has not developed a clear strategic plan for implementing the enterprise.

The reader is in the position to analyse the external circumstances that both provide great opportunity (i.e., a need exists) and create significant barriers to success.  Further, the reader is called on to assess the degree to which Sanjay has considered the roles of different stakeholders and how to effectively engage each of them in the launch of ALTIS. The case is designed to highlight the inherent uncertainties of new enterprise launch, the particular challenges of starting a social enterprise in a developing country, and the role of a variety of stakeholders in influencing the potential success of such as start-up.

Authors: Jacen Greene, Scott Marshall
Institution: Portland State University, United States
Competition Year2010
PlaceFinalist
TrackSocial Entrepreneurship
Key WordsSocial Entrepreneur, Social Enterprise, Microfinance, Nepal, Emerging Markets, Agriculture Regions, Poverty Alleviation, Stakeholder Analysis, New Enterprise Launch, Start-Up
CoursesSocial Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship, Emerging Markets, Microfinance, Finance
Target AudienceUndergraduate Students, MBA Students, Business Executives
Permission RightsThis case is part of the oikos free case collection. Download a free online copy below. If you are a faculty member and you are interested in teaching this case, you can request a free teaching note by sending us an email to freecase@oikosinternational.org.

This case is also part of the oikos Case Collection book (Volume 2): Case Studies in Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainability published by Greenleaf.
DownloadFree Online Copy
Author image

oikos International

posted June 30, 2010

This might be for you.

Farmstar Goes Global: Corporate Entrepreneurship Bringing Sustainable Value Innovation to Agribusinesses

Case Abstract

In 2006 Infoterra France was created as a subsidiary of European aerospace group EADSAstrium to develop and commercialise earth observation satellite technologies with partners Arvalis. Among these was the precision agriculture product – Farmstar. Farmstar provides farmers with recommendations throughout the growing season and enabled subscribers to manage their crops with unprecedented precision. Research began in 1996 and by 2009, 30 agricultural cooperatives representing almost 9,000 farmers and some 400,000 hectares of land, had adopted the service. By 2008 with Farmstar, Infoterra-Arvalis had captured a near monopoly of the rapidly growing market in France. This joint-venture had succeeded where many other companies had tried and failed. The technology’s potential was enormous but could they now grow and protect their position as leaders in the French market and successfully transfer the knowledge to develop new markets outside France?

Authors: Benjamin Warr, Anne Marie Carrick-Cagna, Luk Van Wassenhove
Institution: INSEAD, France
Competition Year2010
PlaceFinalist
TrackCorporate Sustainability
Key WordsCorporate entrepreneurship, Precision Agriculture, Agribusiness, Remote Sensing, Co-operatives, Induced Innovation, Eco-efficiency, Sustainable Value Innovation
CoursesStrategy, Corporate Entrepreneurship, Innovation, Sustainability, Technology Operations Management
Target AudienceMBA, Entrepreneurs, Business Executives
Permission RightsThis case is available for purchase from the Case Centre (810-029-1).
DownloadInspection Copy
Author image

oikos International

posted June 30, 2010

This might be for you.

Business Model Innovation by Better Place: A Green Ecosystem for the Mass Adoption of Electric Cars

Case Abstract

Shai Agassi started Better Place with the ambition of setting up an ecosystem – including a ‘smart grid’ of charging stations and battery swapping facilities – for electric vehicles. These charging stations were to be powered by electricity generated from renewable sources to eliminate indirect emissions due to the operation of electric cars. Better Place also partnered with governments, parking lot operators, and companies to install charging stations. This ecosystem was expected to eliminate the barriers to the mass adoption of electric cars for personal transportation. This case discusses the innovative business model of Better Place, which proposed to offer transportation services to consumers through miles per month subscription plans, with the cost of the electric car being subsidized based on the tenure of the plan.

The software used in the electric cars, which was designed and developed by Better Place, provided the information necessary for the drivers. The company, which positioned itself as a ‘premier global provider of electric vehicle services’, was able to raise US$ 200 million by convincing a few investors. It tied up with select automakers to manufacture cars which would be compatible with its charging infrastructure and battery swapping facilities. It also received support from the regulatory authorities in Israel, Australia, Denmark, Japan, and some states of the United States and Canada. However, it remained to be seen whether the proposed ecosystem and business model would encourage widespread adoption of electric vehicles, reduce the dependence on fossil fuels, and contain the levels of environmental pollution. While the company intended to make the world a better place by accelerating the transition to sustainable transportation, was its business model sustainable in the long run?

Authors: Ramalingam Meenakshisundaram, Besta Shankar
Institution: ICMR Center for Management Research, India
Competition Year2010
Place3rd Place
TrackCorporate Sustainability
Key WordsBetter Place, Social Entrepreneurship, Start-up, Electric Cars, Sustainable Transportation Services, Smart Grid, Clean Technology, Renewable Energy, Lithium Ion Batteries, Hybrid Electric Vehicles, Plug-in Hybrid, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Environmental Pollution, Subscription Plan, Automobiles
CoursesInnovation, Entrepreneurship, Strategic Management, Economics, Business Environment
Target AudienceMBA, MS, MA, EMBA
Permission RightsThis case is available for purchase from the Case Centre (310-147-1). This case is also part of the oikos Case Collection book (Volume 2): Case Studies in Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainability published by Greenleaf.
DownloadInspection Copy
Author image

oikos International

posted June 30, 2010

This might be for you.