Bandhan: Advancing Financial Inclusion in India

Abstract

Established in 2001 by Chandra Shekhar Ghosh to address the dual objective of poverty alleviation and empowerment of women, Bandhan was the largest microfinance institution (MFI) in India and the largest non-deposit taking MFI in the world. By 2013, it had grown to 2,016 branches across 22 states and union territories within India. With over 5 million borrowers and total outstanding loans of INR 57 billion (~US$1 billion), it had zero non-performing loans.

Case A sets up the need for and significance of financial inclusion, and the role of microfinance in the Indian context. It highlights Bandhan’s operational model and the various elements that explain its unique stature in the microfinance space. This case is poised at a junction when Ghosh is looking back with humility at Bandhan’s extraordinary achievements and contemplating plans to extend Bandhan’s reach by foraying into payment banking.

Case B is set at a time when Bandhan was about to embark on an organizational transformation that would convert it into a mainstream bank. In July 2013, supported by a Geneva-based investor, Bandhan had applied for a banking license to expand its operations by leveraging its network. And in May 2014, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had granted the license to Bandhan, making it the first MFI in the country to win a bank license, and also the youngest entity to be allowed to enter the banking space in India.

Ghosh had ambitious growth plans focused on the rural sector. Bandhan seemed to have built the right capabilities to be successful as an MFI. The cases allow for a rich discussion about the new capabilities that Bandhan would require as it shifted from being a pure MFI to a banking entity and how it should go about acquiring those capabilities. Was it preparing well to deal with the challenge of entering, surviving and growing in the banking industry while continuing to serve and grow in the MFI space? Could Bandhan develop a unique and innovative model to help it straddle both worlds?

With this license, Bandhan had been offered an opportunity to re-create the entire banking edifice in India. Participants have the opportunity to analyze the key issues in the cases and attempt to answer the question playing on everyone’s mind – how would Bandhan deliver on the goals of financial inclusion and sustainable banking?

AuthorsCharles Dhanaraj and Geetika Shah
InstitutionInternational Institute for Management Development, Switzerland and Indian School of Business, India
Competition Year2016
PlaceRunner-up
TrackSustainable Finance
Key WordsSustainable finance, Microfinance, Organizational transformation, Entrepreneurship, CSR
CoursesSocial entrepreneurship, General management, Strategy, Banking, Microfinance, Organizational transformation
Target AudienceMBAs, Executive education
Permission rightsThis case will be published at the Case Centre shortly. You can download an inspection copy below.
DownloadInspection Copy
Author image

oikos International

posted June 27, 2016

This might be for you.

IFC Funding of Dinant Project: Call for Overhaul of Risk Assessment for Sustainable Finance

Abstract

The case study is based on a dilemma faced by IFC, one of the financing arms of the World Bank Group, on whether it should release its next round of funding to Corporación Dinant (Dinant), a Hondurus-based vertically-integrated palm oil and food company, to enable it to develop young palm oil plantations. IFC, which proposed to invest US$30million of the total estimated project cost of US$75million, had disbursed US$15 million in November 2009.

Civil society groups had alleged that Dinant had been involved in gross human rights violations and accused it of forced eviction of farmers and inappropriate use of private and public security. The civil liberty groups alleged that IFC had not exercised due diligence in its review of the social risks attached to the project and that it had not responded adequately to the context of intensifying social and political conflict surrounding the project after its commitment to it. The World Bank’s own watchdog Compliance Adviser/Ombudsman (CAO) in its report found multiple failures by IFC in the handling of the Dinant project.

Having faced a backlash from civil liberties groups and having admitted to lapses, IFC now has to decide on whether to go ahead with its next round of US$15 million financing to Dinant. IFC is engaging with Dinant actively but the decision on funding the next round has to be taken. Backtracking on the funding would be seen as a serious blow to sustainable financing while releasing the next round of financing could only happen after Dinant gives a series of commitments to work closely with the community. All in all, the case study will definitely raise issues and call for discussion on appropriately assessing, forecasting, and pricing risks of sustainable finance projects, especially in conflict prone countries in the future.

AuthorsD. Satish and Manish Agarwal
InstitutionIBS Hyderabad, IFHE University, India
Competition Year2016
PlaceSecond Prize
TrackSustainable Finance
Key WordsSustainable finance framework, IFC, Honduras, Dinant, World Bank Group EHS guideline, Oxfam, ESAP Conditions, Compliance Advisor Ombudsman, Bajo Aguán, Stakeholders engagement, community development, Environmental social management
CoursesCorporate Sustainability, Business Ethics
Target AudienceGraduate level students
Permission rightsThis case will be published at the Case Centre shortly. You find an inspection copy for download below.
DownloadInspection Copy
Author image

oikos International

posted June 27, 2016

This might be for you.

Social Franchising to Attain Scale and Sustainability: The Kibera Project in Kenya

Abstract

This case presents the history and development of a Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) project in the Kibera slums of Nairobi, Kenya, that was initiated by Rotarians and funded initially, in large part, by the Rotary International Foundation. It discusses the numerous operational and strategic challenges faced by those working on this Kibera Project and the Rotary Project leader, Kim Larson, whose persistent dedication and business perspective helped to shape much of the project after initial construction of eight water and sanitation kiosks, putting these WASH facilities on a path to sustainable operations. The case issues include Creating Shared Value (CSV), Total Quality Management (TQM) tracking processes, and community engagement that lead to measurable, sustainable operations in the water and sanitation sector.  The case also addresses how to create behavioral change in challenging circumstances like urban slums and how to use hygiene training as a marketing tool to drive usage of WASH facilities. Students will also learn how careful monitoring and analysis of health and financial data demonstrates the 3 Ps of sustainability of an operation (People, Planet, Profits) which, in turn, lay the foundation for replication and expansion in the form of social franchising.

AuthorsKaren Loeb and Vijaya Narapareddy
InstitutionDaniels College of Business, University of Denver, US
Competition Year2016
PlaceRunner-up
TrackSocial Entrepreneurship
Key WordsSocial Franchising, Scale and Sustainability, WASH facilities, Kenya
CoursesSocial Entrepreneurship
Target AudienceMBAs and Executive MBAs
Permission rightsAn inspection copy of this case and more information regarding publication will be posted shortly.
Author image

oikos International

posted June 27, 2016

This might be for you.

Sanergy: Sustainable Sanitation

Abstract

The global sanitation crisis attracted the attention of several regional, national, and international organizations which tried to address the issue in their own way. Still about 2.6 billion people lacked access to decent sanitation facilities across the globe.

Kenya had become a hub of slums with more than 8 million living in the urban slums in the country. Since there were no affordable toilets in these slums, people in these areas relieved themselves either by using pit latrines or by defecating in plastic bags. The result was environment pollution. The communal toilets that existed were often the scenes of crime. The pit latrines were a source of danger to children. To address the sanitation crisis in Kenya, three MIT graduates developed a business which had a non-profit wing to address the issue of inadequate sanitation and a for-profit arm to generate revenues. The company, Sanergy, picked two slums of Nairobi, Kibera and Mukuru, to start with and applied its business model, which included a vertically integrated waste management system – build, franchise, collect, convert, and transfer. The company manufactured toilets which were franchised to the local entrepreneurs of the slums. It then collected the waste from all the toilets to convert it into fertilizers and electricity. The company earned profits by selling the pay-per-use toilets to local entrepreneurs, and then by selling the collected waste after converting it into fertilizers and renewable energy. The local micro-entrepreneurs collected money from the local people for use of the toilets.

These toilets improved hygiene in the slums while providing employment to several local people. People’s health improved and so did the quality of life among slum dwellers. For the founders a few challenges remained – The model needed to be scaled up and expanded to other countries to address the global sanitation crisis.

AuthorsIndu Perepu and Geeta Singh
InstitutionIBS Hyderabad, IFHE University, India
Competition Year2016
PlaceThird Prize
TrackSocial Entrepreneurship
Key WordsSocial Entrepreneurship, Sustainability, Sustainable Sanitation
CoursesCSR, Sustainability
Target AudienceMBA
Permission rightsThis case is will be published at the Case Centre shortly. You can download an inspection copy below.
DownloadInspection Copy
Author image

oikos International

posted June 27, 2016

This might be for you.

Dr. Jim Yong Kim’s Dilemma: International Finance Corporation and the Tata Mundra Power Plant

Abstract

The case study is about the dilemma faced by Dr. Jim Yong Kim (Kim), President of the World Bank Group, related to International Finance Corporation’s (IFC) funding of the Tata Mundra Project in India. The Mundra plant was one of the Ultra Mega Power Projects (UMPPs) conceived with the objective of providing cheap electricity to power-starved states of India. Coastal Gujarat Power Limited (CGPL), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tata Power, implemented the project with funds from various organizations including a funding of US$450 million from IFC.

Before the Tata Mundra power project went on stream, everyone related to the project claimed that it would be beneficial for infrastructure development, economic growth, as well as for the poor communities living in areas near the power plant site, but the project soon started facing some serious criticism on the environmental and social fronts. Critics alleged that the project had a severe impact on the environment, sea water, water level, soil, air, natural habitats, marine life, fish population, livelihood, and health and society as a whole. IFC’s ‘Office of the Compliance Advisor/Ombudsman’ (CAO) did an extensive investigation and found evidence which validated the main aspects of the Machimar Adhikar Sangharsh Sangathan (MASS) complaint. The management of IFC largely rejected the findings of the CAO, and Kim faced a lot of criticism for toeing the management line.

Kim was caught in a dilemma as the criticism grew more strident over the following months. If he still did not accept the findings of the CAO, then he as well as IFC risked being viewed as not doing enough for the environment and communities that were allegedly affected by the Tata Mundra power plant. On the other hand, if he did a U-turn and accepted the finding of the CAO, then he would have to stop the sustainable financing of US$450 million to the Tata Mundra project, which was established with the objective of providing cheap and reliable electricity to millions of people of developing India.

AuthorsDebapratim Purkayastha and Manish Agarwal
InstitutionIBS Hyderabad, IFHE University, India
Competition Year2015
PlaceWinner
TrackSustainable Finance
Key WordsSustainable Finance, Sustainability for banks and financial institutions, Banks and the Energy sector, Coal financing, Human rights as a Management issue, Human rights and sustainability, Businesses as human rights advocates, Business-government-society relationship; Stakeholder management, Stakeholder tension
CoursesElective courses in Financial Management, Corporate Sustainability, Business Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility
Target AudienceMBA
Purchase InformationYou can purchase the case at the Case Centre.
DownloadInspection Copy
Author image

oikos International

posted June 24, 2015

This might be for you.

Sistema Ser: Scaling Private Health Care for the Base of the Pyramid

Abstract

The case revolves around “Sistema Ser” (SSer) (1), a private health care organization that serves the base of the pyramid (BOP) in northern Argentina, and its founder and director, Argentine gynecologist Dr. Jorge Gronda. In the late 1990s, Dr. Gronda had begun to serve the poor—particularly women in the remote Puna region—on an unpaid, voluntary basis. Eventually, the initiative developed into a formal network of organizations comprising CEGIN (a private enterprise and medical center offering preventive and primary gynecological services); a number of affiliated physicians and other health care providers (e.g., pharmacies); and Fundación Ser (FSer), a foundation that coordinates the affiliation of network providers and markets SSer among potential members. The SSer network is financially self-sustaining and, at the same time, able to provide affordable services to its patients from the BOP. SSer is based on a system of membership cards and a network of providers that offer high-quality services at a price 40- to 60- percent lower than that of other private providers.

For more than 15 years, SSer has been delivering primary health services, which cover 80 percent of the most common low-cost and non-complex health problems, mainly to people at the BOP and within San Salvador, the capital of the province of Jujuy. Recent developments have led Dr. Gronda to consider options for scaling his organization’s impact. He wonders whether he should geographically expand the delivery of SSer’s existing service portfolio in order to reach BOP communities outside of San Salvador, or whether he should extend SSer’s service portfolio by delivering additional services in San Salvador.

The case illustrates the development path of a social innovation born of a volunteer initiative and transformed into a sustainable structure. One of its main objectives is to make students aware of key factors that need to be considered in regard to scaling decisions in general and those at the base of the pyramid in particular.

(1) At the time this case was finalized, the founders of Sistema Ser were planning to rename their organization into “Umana”.

AuthorsSilke Bucher (HEC Montréal), Urs Jäger (INCAE Business School) and Andrea M. Prado (INCAE Business School)
InstitutionHEC Montréal (Canada), INCAE Business School (Costa Rica)
Competition Year2015
PlaceSecond Prize
TrackSocial Entrepreneurship
Key WordsSocial innovation, bottom of the pyramid, scaling, inclusive business, social entrepreneurship, sustainable strategies
CoursesSocial entrepreneurship, sustainable strategic management, healthcare
Target AudienceUndergrads, Master's students, practitioners
Purchase InformationThe case is published at the Journal of Business Research via open access here.
DownloadAbridged Inspection Copy
Author image

oikos International

posted June 24, 2015

This might be for you.

Building a Sustainable Enterprise with the Power of Local Communities- The Journey of Neev Herbal Handmade Soaps

Abstract

Poverty, illiteracy and gender discrimination have been the underlying factors that have stifled development in the villages of Jharkhand state in northern India. In 2006, Hudlung village located in the outskirts of the steel city of Jamshedpur was acutely stricken by poverty with about 80% of the population living below the poverty line, as defined by the Government of India. Gender discrimination against females was also a rampant practice and avenues of education as well as employment were few and far between. The men of the households used to work in the paddy fields or as contract laborers in the steel industry, while the women took care of household chores.

This abysmal situation was prevalent when the Jains, Anurag and Shikha, decided to initiate a new paradigm of socio-economic empowerment of the local community. In 2007, they started Neev Herbal handmade Soaps with the vision to produce the highest quality hand crafted herbal products while providing a dignified means of employment for rural women and rejuvenating the rural economy. The enterprise has since had a remarkable transformative effect on the village community.

Currently, Neev products are primarily sold through 180 retail store partners spread across India and to a lesser extent through 10 niche e-tailing partners. The latest annual revenues for Neev stand close to Rs. 4.5 million. With a good market presence in the Metros and Tier I cities, Neev is exploring the prospects of partnering with mass market e-tailers to target customer bases in Tier II and Tier III Indian cities. This would not only generate more employment opportunities for the women of Hudlung but also enable it to compete with other herbal soap manufacturers who have already adopted the e-tailing channel.

AuthorsSaurav Kumar Das and Sanjana Grover
Institution: Xavier School of Management, India
Competition Year2015
PlaceRunner up
TrackSocial Entrepreneurship
Key WordsHand made soaps, community empowerment, e-tailing, Sustainable Manufacturing
CoursesOrganizational Change & Development, e-commerce (Marketing), Social Entrepreneurship, Strategic Management
Target AudienceMBAs, Undergrads, Aspiring Social Entrepreneurs
Permission RightsThis case is part of the oikos free case collection. Download a free online copy below. If you are a faculty member and you are interested in teaching this case, you can request a free teaching note by sending us an email to freecase@oikosinternational.org.
DownloadFree Online Copy
Author image

oikos International

posted June 24, 2015

This might be for you.

Arunachalam Muruganantham: A Social Entrepreneur Innovating in a Woman’s World

Abstract

Considered taboo in many parts of the world, menstrual hygiene was a subject ridden with many myths and misconceptions, especially in a country like India. Arunachalam Muruganantham (Muruganantham), was the man who had revolutionised female sanitary hygiene and had created a lasting impact on the health and livelihood of women, mostly in rural India. With his pioneering and patented invention of a low cost sanitary pad making machine, Muruganantham had a vision to make India a ‘100% sanitary napkin using country.’

A majority of the Indian women adopted unhygienic methods during their periods, increasing the incidence of reproductive tract infection and cervical cancer. Through hard work and perseverance, Muruganantham had popularised his invention not only in India but also internationally. In doing so, he chose to market his machine mainly to NGOs and Self Help Groups (SHGs), who in turn employed women to manufacture the low-cost napkins. Operated in a totally self sustaining manner, this direct selling model provided employment opportunities to rural women, who also spread awareness about the importance of menstrual hygiene.

In taking his project forward, Muruganantham faced competition from other NGOs who were operating in this field and from multinationals who had launched lower cost brands. Also, the Government, which had a key role to play in impacting female hygiene, did not seem too encouraging of the SHGs. With awareness levels abysmally low and response to sanitary napkin usage quite discouraging, would Muruganantham be able to realise his vision to make India a ‘100% sanitary napkin using country’?

AuthorsDoris Rajakumari John
InstitutionAmity Research Center, India
Competition Year2015
PlaceThird Prize
TrackSocial Entrepreneurship
Key WordsEntrepreneurship, Menstrual Hygiene, Social Innovation, Grass root Innovation, Women Empowerment, Rural Job Creation, Developing Countries, Word-of-mouth Marketing
CoursesSocial Entrepreneurship, Ethics and Social Responsibility
Target AudiencePost Graduate Management Students
Permission RightsThis case is part of the oikos free case collection. Download a free online copy below. If you are a faculty member and you are interested in teaching this case, you can request a free teaching note by sending us an email to freecase@oikosinternational.org.
DownloadFree Online Copy
Author image

oikos International

posted June 24, 2015

This might be for you.

Asia Meet

oikos Asia Meet 2014 will be hosted by oikos Pune at the main campus of Symbiosis International University, Pune. The theme of the Meet is ‘Innovation in sustainability‘. Registration is open!

Read more

Author image

oikos International

posted April 7, 2014

This might be for you.

oikos UNDP Young Scholars Development Academy

oikos UNDP Young Scholars Development Academy 2013

Organising and Governing Inclusive Business Models

Location: Istanbul, Turkey

Date: 2 – 6 September, 2013

The oikos UNDP Young Scholars Development Academy 2013 at the UNDP Istanbul International Center for Private Sector in Development (IICPSD), Istanbul, provides PhD students and young scholars working on poverty and sustainable development from an organisational or management perspective a platform to present and discuss their on-going research projects with fellow students and senior faculty. Read more

Author image

oikos International

posted July 17, 2013

This might be for you.